0
101 Aug 11, 2004 at 13:16

new theory of time-space: revolution in physics 1

1,Time is space distance or curvature. Change in times-pace is that in distance or curvature. There are two kinds time-space. One is plan or linear time-space. Another is spherical time-space.

2, There are three kinds of clock:
Current Clock:
It works based on the principle of the earth rotating once 24 hours around the sun. Its second unit is 0.004167 degrees. It describes the change in the position of thing on the earth referring to the sun
Thing Clock:
Every thing has its own thing clock with different second-distance. This Clock tells thing self what is happening for it.
Doppler Clock:
Every observer has one’s own Doppler clock with different second-distance or second-curvature. Observer tells self how the space state of thing is changing.

3, Doppler phenomenon: It is a result of compress or prolongation of time-space relative to observer. According to the principle of the relative motion of time-space curvature, red-shifted does not really mean that the universe is expanding.

4, Four-dimensional Coordinates: It consists of three dimension and sphere time-space. In this coordinates, there is not real straight line or circle.

5, The motion of linear time-space is passive, but the motion of sphere time-space is active.

6, A duality of curved time-space and its two focuses: contraction energy or action (converging on its centre, real focus) and expansion energy or action (dispersing from its centre, virtual focus).

XiaoZhong Zhai, Thing and Its Law (Vitualbookworm.com Publishing Inc, college station, 2003). chapter. 2. [The Active and Passive Motion of Time-Space] and chapter. 5. [The Duality of Time-Space and Energy].

#### 26 Replies

0
102 Aug 11, 2004 at 13:57

Yeah…. (tickeling my arm)….. nice……..

And now our super-duper suggestion for the millenium!!!!

You buy that book and you recieve:

color tv
dvd
NVidia Radeon 10, 800 with -512 on-board RAM
pack of pancakes
rubber duck

TOTALY FREE!!!

and if you call in the next 10 minutes you recieve a vacume cleaner!!!

So, what are you waiting for???

0
101 Aug 11, 2004 at 14:09

A post to raise up from the dead? :)

0
101 Aug 11, 2004 at 15:39

so we are back to that again ?

0
101 Aug 11, 2004 at 16:59

while “on topic”, webmessenger doesn’t allow you to reply, anubis. is that so far correct? well, it’s beta for now.. but anyways.. annoying!

0
101 Aug 11, 2004 at 17:44

So as a more pointful topic, is I Robot good? I’ve not seen it yet (just out over here)

0
101 Aug 11, 2004 at 18:45

i’ll see it saturday. i guess. :D

0
102 Aug 12, 2004 at 06:00

Saw it a week ago (..again… don’t ask how…) and i’m not impressed at all. I mean - effects are somewhat good, Will Smith is there but the story… one gets the feeling he has already saw that millions of times…

But it desn’t hurt to watch it :))

0
101 Aug 12, 2004 at 07:24

Hmm, deja vu?

0
101 Aug 12, 2004 at 07:56

i disabled the the accounts posting capabilities as the author apparently does nothing but spamming the board

0
101 Aug 12, 2004 at 09:53

You cruel, horrible admin.. *lets a tiny evil laugh out*

0
101 Aug 12, 2004 at 15:27

harhar! :D

0
101 Aug 12, 2004 at 17:58

Ok, I watched I. Robot, and it’s just like all the other Will Smith movies, lots of action and effects, no good deep story.. Don’t bother going to the cinema to see it.

0
101 Aug 12, 2004 at 18:37

the film isn’t that bad… is it? I saw it last weekend and I thought it was decent. not the greatest film out there but…

:yes:

0
101 Aug 15, 2004 at 13:33

i nearly wasted a laugh when i saw will smith in an interview about the movie. he claimed that the movie was serving many genres like comedy and drama.

0
101 Aug 15, 2004 at 21:58

@anubis

i disabled the the accounts posting capabilities as the author apparently does nothing but spamming the board [snapback]9224[/snapback]

Why disable?? Just delete him. It’ll free up some space on the db

0
101 Aug 16, 2004 at 07:02

i can’t do that

0
101 Aug 16, 2004 at 07:57

@anubis

i nearly wasted a laugh when i saw will smith in an interview about the movie. he claimed that the movie was serving many genres like comedy and drama. [snapback]9266[/snapback]

actually, he’s quite right about it.. i liked it, it was a good movie. was entertaining, gave some reminding thoughts afterwards, made me laught, feel emotional, etc.. it took a while to get rolling, sorta.. the start was quite .. slow.. but else, a good movie.

i liked the red back-light in the audi-logo at the back of his car. i’m thinking of getting some similar light back there, looks cool..

now i should just get my own audi TT …. :D

0
101 Aug 16, 2004 at 09:10

come on… go watch some real movies… this is plain crap. i’m not questioning it’s entertainment factor but it hardly qualifies as a good movie as it’s probably as intellectual devoid as any other will smith movie or action/sci-fi piece for that matter

0
101 Aug 16, 2004 at 09:19

hm. i don’t think so. but if you think so, it’s your problem (if you payed for it, that is:D:D).

0
101 Aug 16, 2004 at 09:47

can’t say that i have problem with it :) i might even watch it because it’s fun but i was just pointing out that i find it a bit ridiculous that will smith talks like they just presented the latest in artish avant garde film

0
101 Aug 16, 2004 at 22:53

Is the book worth reading? The Harry Potter series were much better than the (nicely made) films

0
101 Aug 17, 2004 at 01:11

@anubis

come on… go watch some real movies… this is plain crap. i’m not questioning it’s entertainment factor but it hardly qualifies as a good movie as it’s probably as intellectual devoid as any other will smith movie or action/sci-fi piece for that matter [snapback]9289[/snapback]

How bout that old movie. with smith and matt daemon. what was the name? … ah. The legend of Bagger Vance. quite philosophical it was.

0
102 Aug 17, 2004 at 05:17

There was a cool movie with Matt Damon a quite while ago. “Dogma” or something like that. Pretty cool!

0
101 Aug 17, 2004 at 07:47

How bout that old movie. with smith and matt daemon.

old ? it’s from 2000 :)
anyway, what can i say ? the exception proves the rule ? i haven’t seen the movie so i can’t tell

0
101 Aug 18, 2004 at 06:03

wich you haven’t seen? i, robot?.. if so, don’t pre-judge it!

0
101 Aug 18, 2004 at 20:36

i haven’t seen “The legend of Bagger Vance”