DevIL or FreeImage, pros and cons...
which one is the most 'unrestricted' for using in commercial projects...?
DevIL or FreeImage
Started by Enlight, Jun 27 2007 07:33 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 June 2007 - 07:33 PM
#2
Posted 29 June 2007 - 08:11 PM
Ok, I have chosen FreeImage. But I'm concerned about, how "free" is FreeImage.
Does anyone understand the FreeImage Public License?
http://freeimage.sou...age-license.txt
Can I link statically in a commercial product? What are the limitations...
Thanks
Does anyone understand the FreeImage Public License?
http://freeimage.sou...age-license.txt
Can I link statically in a commercial product? What are the limitations...
Thanks
#3
Posted 29 June 2007 - 08:57 PM
As far as I know ogre transfered to freeimage to allow static linking, so my deduction is that static linking indeed is allowed. I am not sure about further limitations.
#4
Posted 30 June 2007 - 10:37 AM
Enlight said:
Can I link statically in a commercial product? What are the limitations...
Thanks
Thanks
Good question. Keep in mind, that the freeimage license is just one license you have to check. Freeimage by itself does not do the actual image loading but links a bunch of other libraries for the hard part.
My music: http://myspace.com/planetarchh <-- my music
My stuff: torus.untergrund.net <-- some diy electronic stuff and more.
My stuff: torus.untergrund.net <-- some diy electronic stuff and more.
#5
Posted 30 June 2007 - 11:35 PM
Ok, I could link dynamically with freeimage, but even in this case, I'm still concerned about the FreeImage Public License.
I'm not a lawyer and the license text is long...., that makes me think: if we programmers need to understand licenses, does lawyers have to understand c++? heheh
I'm not a lawyer and the license text is long...., that makes me think: if we programmers need to understand licenses, does lawyers have to understand c++? heheh
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












