Hello,
I have an object moving around a landscape and I need the camera to follow it's position and orientation. I've tried playing with the quaternion for the mesh orientation, but as I don't know a lot of quaternion and matrix math, I cannot do it alone. Considering that I have the rotation matrix and the rotation quat of the object, how can I build my view matrix so it follows it?
Thank you for your help
0
Camera following an object
Started by alkisclio, Jun 17 2007 12:05 PM
2 replies to this topic
#2
-
- Members
-
- 368 posts
Senior Member
Posted 17 June 2007 - 03:24 PM
Hey there...
What do you mean by following the object ? :)
Currently, the problem is a little bit unspecific.
If you just want your camera to be statically fixed in relation to the object, it's quite simple.
First, build the absolute camera position, for example by taking the position of your object, and subtracting a fixed vector (0, heightoffset, depthoffset).
(You can also fix the camera at an absolute position by simply using the absolute position vector instead of the given subtraction result.)
Then, build the orientation of your camera: Take a vector from the camera position to the object position. This will be your new looking direction, so normalize it, and place it into the new world transform's z vector (assuming x is to the right, y up, and z into depth). Then, take the object's local x vector from the object's rotation matrix, and use it as the new world transform's x vector. Now we are only missing a new y (up) vector for your camera. This one can easily be derived from the x and z vector already existant in your transform: since y is perpendicular to x and z, use a cross product on these to get your y vector.
This camera now always is right behind the object, floats a little bit above it, and has the object at the center of the viewport.
However, especially for large distances and fast-turning objects this might produce undesireable behaviour, i.e. too fast spinning, and non-smooth camera movement. For these cases, the camera should always have some movement dampening. For this, refer to spherical-linear interpolation (slerp), and report back with questions.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
- Wernaeh
What do you mean by following the object ? :)
Currently, the problem is a little bit unspecific.
If you just want your camera to be statically fixed in relation to the object, it's quite simple.
First, build the absolute camera position, for example by taking the position of your object, and subtracting a fixed vector (0, heightoffset, depthoffset).
(You can also fix the camera at an absolute position by simply using the absolute position vector instead of the given subtraction result.)
Then, build the orientation of your camera: Take a vector from the camera position to the object position. This will be your new looking direction, so normalize it, and place it into the new world transform's z vector (assuming x is to the right, y up, and z into depth). Then, take the object's local x vector from the object's rotation matrix, and use it as the new world transform's x vector. Now we are only missing a new y (up) vector for your camera. This one can easily be derived from the x and z vector already existant in your transform: since y is perpendicular to x and z, use a cross product on these to get your y vector.
This camera now always is right behind the object, floats a little bit above it, and has the object at the center of the viewport.
However, especially for large distances and fast-turning objects this might produce undesireable behaviour, i.e. too fast spinning, and non-smooth camera movement. For these cases, the camera should always have some movement dampening. For this, refer to spherical-linear interpolation (slerp), and report back with questions.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
- Wernaeh
Some call me mathematician, some just call me computer guy. Yet, I prefer the term professional weirdo :)
#3
-
- Members
-
- 2 posts
New Member
Posted 19 June 2007 - 07:57 AM
I will try this tonight, thank you very much 
Yes I will use some interpolation. This is for a racing game by the way, so there is a lot of fast object movement.
Yes I will use some interpolation. This is for a racing game by the way, so there is a lot of fast object movement.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
