My Brother's School in New Jersey
#1
Posted 06 March 2006 - 02:11 PM
pyramid : a shape in which one face is a polygon and the other faces are triangles with a common vertex.
a polygon is a 2 dimensional shape consisting of straight sides that meet only at their ends.
architectural examples of pyramids include the transamerican building in san francisco, the temple of the sun in peru, and the pyramids in egypt.
sphere : a shape with a curved surface that is, at all points, the same distance from its center point.
So what is so hillarious about that you may ask ? In general nothing... except that my little brother is in the first grade, not Midschool. Is this the no child left behind initiative gone insane ? Additionally many school here seem to have canned recess.
I find this totally unbelievable. In fact i feel that it is abuse of children.
#2
Posted 06 March 2006 - 04:58 PM
#3
Posted 06 March 2006 - 05:17 PM
Seriously though, is he actually meant to understand that, and is it on par with the rest of the work he brings home?
On a good note though, as least its not like the dribble they teach here in England, that producing a generation of muppets without a clue how to live and work in the real world.
Spree
#4
Posted 06 March 2006 - 05:38 PM
How are his 3dsmax skills?
#5
Posted 06 March 2006 - 06:03 PM
Quote
yeah... he'll make a great game programmer, too.
Quote
I'm not sure how they organize the day in school, but juding from what he brings home it is totally not on a childs level. i'm not even saying that a child shouldn't know about geometry, it's just that it's presented to them in this weird fashion. His worksheets look more like they are meant for the parents, so that they understand what their child is doing.
Well... If your public school system is on the level of Cuba, you maybe just feel that you have to catch up :)
#6
Posted 06 March 2006 - 07:47 PM
anubis said:
*Must resist not to make jokes out of this and post links to the health care index of cuba and the states*
#7
Posted 06 March 2006 - 07:47 PM
#8
Posted 06 March 2006 - 08:07 PM
#9
Posted 06 March 2006 - 10:05 PM
#10
Posted 07 March 2006 - 01:32 AM
Quote
I'm german and my brother lives here... yes. What is strange about that ? My mother moved here. I could go into the story but would rather not.
As for the appropriateness. Maybe you should dig up some first grade material of yourself. As for me I learned addition and substraction in first grade. And believe me, it goes on like this at this school. I'm glad to have a discussion about what is good for a child and what's not if you want. In fact I'm very much interested to know if this is standard here. I admit i was kind of presupposing that anybody would find this a bit strange for a first grade.
Quote
One need not make fun of it. It's just a fact that's out there, whether people are offended by it or not.
#11
Posted 07 March 2006 - 06:21 AM
Lead Designer/Project Manager - White Epsilon
#12
Posted 07 March 2006 - 06:48 PM
So don't worry, I don't think he's getting too much.
#13
Posted 07 March 2006 - 07:33 PM
IMO it is the best way of teaching,The period of general education is about 14 years it is relatively short so to make the children walk with this fast evolving world of technology they must teach them things are beyond the basics that have been teached before.
#14
Posted 07 March 2006 - 09:39 PM
#15
Posted 07 March 2006 - 10:01 PM
I'm sure that it's also not only me... Most people from Europe I've talked to about this find it totally outlandish.
Quote
I think that's exactly part of the issue. Why is it so important to always have progress. Are we really willing to put our children's mental health at risk for this ?
I wonder if a dramatic rise in alleged ADHD cases and the rise or drugs like Ritalin, to treat this mental deffects, and the deaths that result from it aren't somehow more worthy of attention than technical achievement.
I'm sure that changes in the society as a whole contribute to these increasing numbers of kids that are put on drugs similar to amphetamin. But given that a kid spends half it's day in school one can wonder if school has potential effects on children. Putting to much presure on them, to understand things that they don't connect to, for example.
#16
Posted 07 March 2006 - 11:42 PM
Maybe the aim of the school system in the states is different. As I said, I have the feeling that the point of this system is to accumulate as much knowledge in the children as possible and not making them understand any deeper concepts. In part that might be related to the test they are supposed to take in third grade, which certainly puts a lot of pressure on the school.
My theory is that the main idea behin school here is to get your child into college, whereas in Germany there is this idea, that school and university are there for giving you the tools to you need, for whatever you want to do in life, with much less of a focus on jobs and economy. As a result there seems to be a bigger focus on doing what's good for the child (whether the current trends in pedagogics are actually good is another question) in psychological terms.
At any rate, I aplogize for the ridiculing tone of my original post.
#17
Posted 07 March 2006 - 11:54 PM
#18
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:04 AM
After the first meeting the physical training starts. If the child doesnt want to join "them", then he is given a revolutionary form of electro-shock therapy which targets specific information inside the brain and literally fries the information relating to as far back as the start of the meeting.
The kid either lives his/her life happily ever after withough "them", or if s/he agrees to join up with "them", becomes a prisoner for life.
- Me blog
#19
Posted 08 March 2006 - 02:55 AM
Quote
That is plainly assuming that we can feed more an more information to our brains, without any limits. Also i'm not objecting to what they learn (at least that is a completely other debate), I'm objecting to the way it is put to them. As I said. I think you need to have a connection to what you learn, or most people remember nothing of what they have learned. That's why children learn through game. They can not reason about what they learn as we do, hence can not find motivation in things by reasoning about them, so they pick up what is necessary by play. That seems to me is the nature of human learning.
Also if you have to put your kids on drugs so that they behave in school, i find it at least debatable to speak of an evolutionary process.
Quote
They should ask Ewan Cameron to head the project.
#20
Posted 08 March 2006 - 04:21 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












