Jump to content


The human race is using 25% of the Universe


43 replies to this topic

#1 opcode-foo

    New Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 12:18 PM

Supposedely, there are 10^80 total particles in the Universe, or something like that. Well, I was thinking about this, it seems rather like a large number right? Hmm..

Well, there are (supposedely according to Andre La Mother) 10^11 neurons in a typical human brain. Let's suppose, that each neuron is one particle, just for laughs. There are supposedly 10 billion people alive right now. So, that would mean that the human race and all their brains are using up 10^22 particles of the universe out of the 10^80 particles.

So my theory is this: the universe is being rapidly absorbed. Think about this. There are probably about 1000 terrabytes of hard drives in the earth. Let's imagine that 1 bit of information requires 1 particle (this is not rigorous) so, now we have left maybe 10^10 particles in the Universe left.

In summary: every time we reproduce or build a hard drive, a planet on the edge of the Universe is destroyed as it's particles are absorbed by our conquest.

The Universe is finished guys.:wallbash:

#2 bladder

    DevMaster Staff

  • Moderators
  • 1057 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 12:34 PM

mkaaaaay...

Though, this is all based on your supposition of there being 10^80 particles in total. And another thing, 10^22 is not 25% of 10^80. is 10^1 25% of 10^4? It's more like 0.01% or something like that.

#3 .oisyn

    DevMaster Staff

  • Moderators
  • 1822 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 12:47 PM

10^22 / 10^80 = 10^(22 - 80) = 10^-58
so it's 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% :)
C++ addict
-
Currently working on: the 3D engine for Tomb Raider.

#4 opcode-foo

    New Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 01:39 PM

But Andre La Mother confirmed this to be accurate. I have a PhD from the University of BS, and I can confirm my statistical analysis is correct!

You're just jealous of my superior scientific findings.:yes:

#5 monjardin

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1033 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 02:11 PM

About 67.35% of all statistics are made up on the spot. ;)

#6 .oisyn

    DevMaster Staff

  • Moderators
  • 1822 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 02:22 PM

opcode-foo said:

But Andre La Mother confirmed this to be accurate. I have a PhD from the University of BS, and I can confirm my statistical analysis is correct!

You're just jealous of my superior scientific findings.:yes:

So what, my penis is bigger :cool2:
C++ addict
-
Currently working on: the 3D engine for Tomb Raider.

#7 opcode-foo

    New Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 02:26 PM

Look, you might doubt me, being new and all... but Andre La Mothe himself confirmed my THEORY:blink: Do you DOUBT ANDRE LA MOTHER?!?!?!

#8 eddie

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 751 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 02:34 PM

opcode-foo said:

Look, you might doubt me, being new and all... but Andre La Mothe himself confirmed my THEORY:blink: Do you DOUBT ANDRE LA MOTHER?!?!?!

I know a lot of people do. :)

#9 .oisyn

    DevMaster Staff

  • Moderators
  • 1822 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 04:10 PM

It's "André LaMothe", if you give the guy credit at least spell his name correctly.
C++ addict
-
Currently working on: the 3D engine for Tomb Raider.

#10 TheNut

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 1472 posts
  • LocationThornhill, ON

Posted 22 December 2005 - 06:10 PM

Well, better the universe :alien: to suffer at the hands of humanity rather then the reverse.
http://www.nutty.ca - Being a nut has its advantages.

#11 opcode-foo

    New Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 09:28 PM

.oisyn said:

It's "André LaMothe", if you give the guy credit at least spell his name correctly.

Andre LaMothe.

Ahh, that's how he spells it, I see! I was confused by this publisher telling me what a Andre LaMother f*** I was for the boatload of premier press books that were returned without selling. GAH!

Adios boys.

#12 Methulah

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 727 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 10:14 PM

Also, there are only 6.2 or something billion people in the universe, not ten billion.
Django Merope-Synge :: django@white-epsilon.com
Lead Designer/Project Manager - White Epsilon

#13 zavie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 91 posts

Posted 22 December 2005 - 11:34 PM

Prove it. :-]

#14 Nautilus

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 326 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 02:10 AM

.oisyn said:

So what, my penis is bigger
Well, I fart louder :closedeye

Btw...
:cool2: <--- Isn't it Andrè LaMothe?
Come on, it's him! -hehehe-

Ciao ciao :)
-Nautilus

(readin' this? perhaps you should get out more -- give it a thought)


#15 Onikhaosifix

    Valued Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 117 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 02:36 AM

I'm surprise this topic hasn't been deleted yet. lol @ "Andre le Mother"

#16 Jynks

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 85 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 02:37 AM

There is quite a good novel by Greg Egan called Quarantine a kind of sequal/rewrite of one of his top notch short stories in Luminous witch is kinda about this very topic.

Quote

The novel is set in the near future (2034-2060), after the solar system has been surrounded by an impenetrable shield known as the Bubble. The Bubble permits no light to enter the solar system, and as a consequence the stars can no longer be seen. This seems to be mere background at first, but in fact it is central to the plot.

The Bubble, it appears, was constructed by aliens to prevent humanity from wreaking massive destruction on the rest of the universe, though this remains speculative. The human brain is responsible for all causality, by collapsing wavefunctions representing systems into a particular eigenstate. Human observations of the universe were reducing its diversity and potentiality (for instance, by rendering it uninhabitable to beings that relied on stars being something other than the enormous nuclear fusion-powered furnaces human astronomers have observed them to be).

Top notch scifi book if you are into that kinda thing (witch I am :)

#17 moe

    Valued Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 03:29 AM

This thread reminds me of an old saying we have here in Switzerland.

"Big cheese equals small cheese."


Because:
1. The bigger the cheese the bigger the wholes.
2. The bigger the cheese the more wholes.

The bigger the wholes and the more wholes there are the less space there is for cheese.
The less space for cheese the smaller the cheese is.

Hence,
Big cheese == small cheese

#18 Reedbeta

    DevMaster Staff

  • Administrators
  • 4979 posts
  • LocationBellevue, WA

Posted 23 December 2005 - 05:43 AM

It's holes, btw, not wholes =) Whole means all of something, like two halves make a whole. A hole is a place where something is missing =)
reedbeta.com - developer blog, OpenGL demos, and other projects

#19 moe

    Valued Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 07:39 AM

Lol, my bad but I see you got the point anyway.
Of course if one would speak proper English one would mean hole...

#20 .oisyn

    DevMaster Staff

  • Moderators
  • 1822 posts

Posted 23 December 2005 - 09:12 AM

Jynks said:

There is quite a good novel by Greg Egan called Quarantine a kind of sequal/rewrite of one of his top notch short stories in Luminous witch is kinda about this very topic.

Top notch scifi book if you are into that kinda thing (witch I am :lol:

Sounds like a cool plot. But then again, quantum physics is always cool :)
C++ addict
-
Currently working on: the 3D engine for Tomb Raider.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users