Jump to content


No links until Nth Post


15 replies to this topic

#1 onyxthedog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 467 posts

Posted 18 December 2009 - 05:33 PM

I am kind of stealing this from dev shed, but to prevent spam could we disable links in posts/signatures until they have n number of posts?
/* Perfect_day.c */
#include <arcade>
#include <computer>
#include <drinks>
#include <hardware/high_end>
#include <snacks>
#pragma <responisiblities>
...........

#2 rouncer

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2758 posts

Posted 19 December 2009 - 08:24 AM

nah, thats no good, thats deprivation of liberty.
you used to be able to fit a game on a disk, then you used to be able to fit a game on a cd, then you used to be able to fit a game on a dvd, now you can barely fit one on your harddrive.

#3 poita

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 322 posts

Posted 19 December 2009 - 08:39 AM

That would be no good. What if people want to ask a question that requires a link? Most new members sign up because they have a question to ask, and I think it's unreasonable to prevent these people from linking us to their problems.

#4 Mihail121

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1059 posts

Posted 19 December 2009 - 03:53 PM

Give n, give a long list of arguments, then we start discussing.

#5 onyxthedog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 467 posts

Posted 20 December 2009 - 05:25 AM

It doesn't stop them from posting it as text for example:
www.google.com
Google!

Well, it automatically adds the url tag, but the top one I didn't intend to be an actual link.
/* Perfect_day.c */
#include <arcade>
#include <computer>
#include <drinks>
#include <hardware/high_end>
#include <snacks>
#pragma <responisiblities>
...........

#6 starstutter

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1039 posts

Posted 21 December 2009 - 03:04 AM

How about we advise the user that he cannot post links for 8 posts (displayed when they first create their account).

If the user tries to post a link, they will recieve a (very clear and flashy) message telling them that they cannot do that until they have completled 8 posts (and the post will not be put up, it will wait till they remove the link and will not count as a post).

If the user attepmts to post more than (say) 3 in a row with links in them, the account is banned.

If the user misses the "REFRAIN FROM POSTING LINKS!!!" message more than 3 times, chances are almost certain its a bot (or a human with the intelligence level of a spammer).

Signatures though I've never seen as a real issue, but I'm sure we could rig up a system for that too.
(\__/)
(='.'=)
This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into
(")_(") your signature to help him gain world domination.
bunny also wants to fight spam: Click Here Bots!

#7 StudioFortress

    New Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts

Posted 24 December 2009 - 05:50 PM

starstutter said:

How about we advise the user that he cannot post links for 8 posts (displayed when they first create their account).

If the user tries to post a link, they will recieve a (very clear and flashy) message telling them that they cannot do that until they have completled 8 posts (and the post will not be put up, it will wait till they remove the link and will not count as a post).

If the user attepmts to post more than (say) 3 in a row with links in them, the account is banned.

If the user misses the "REFRAIN FROM POSTING LINKS!!!" message more than 3 times, chances are almost certain its a bot (or a human with the intelligence level of a spammer).
I think you should remove the banning bit at the end. You will be banning some members purely because they failed to read or understand a warning. I don't think that on it's own is enough justification to ban new members. They haven't actually gone against the rule (their links are still failing to be posted).

starstutter said:

Signatures though I've never seen as a real issue, but I'm sure we could rig up a system for that too.
If it's not broken, then don't fix it.
StudioFortress.com - OpenGL games in your browser, Blog.

#8 onyxthedog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 467 posts

Posted 24 December 2009 - 07:12 PM

We are a predominately male group (any females here?), so of course if its not broken we will still try to fix it!:lol:
/* Perfect_day.c */
#include <arcade>
#include <computer>
#include <drinks>
#include <hardware/high_end>
#include <snacks>
#pragma <responisiblities>
...........

#9 Reedbeta

    DevMaster Staff

  • Administrators
  • 5340 posts
  • LocationSanta Clara, CA

Posted 24 December 2009 - 07:41 PM

Signature spam actually turns up quite often. In any case, I think I agree with poita. This would be an unreasonable burden on legitimate new members. Having the mods manually delete spam posts works well enough, IMHO. :) Also, in case anyone didn't know, you can report a spam post to the mods by clicking the Posted Image icon in the corner of a post. Doing that sends us all an email about it. Although, for me personally, I generally check DevMaster right after checking email, so it won't get me there any faster. ;)
reedbeta.com - developer blog, OpenGL demos, and other projects

#10 alphadog

    DevMaster Staff

  • Moderators
  • 1716 posts

Posted 30 December 2009 - 02:47 PM

Yeah, with (at least) three of us checking email, mostly North American time zones though, spam does happen but is pretty short-lived.
Hyperbole is, like, the absolute best, most wonderful thing ever! However, you'd be an idiot to not think dogmatism is always bad.

#11 starstutter

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1039 posts

Posted 30 December 2009 - 06:28 PM

onyxthedog said:

We are a predominately male group, so of course if its not broken we will still try to fix it!
We need duct tape! *makes manly grunt*
(\__/)
(='.'=)
This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into
(")_(") your signature to help him gain world domination.
bunny also wants to fight spam: Click Here Bots!

#12 johnson1

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 31 December 2009 - 04:53 PM

Well I too carry a view that links should be disabled unless the nth post. Not in the actual post but in the signature. I am new and I know my signature will be deleted but i will be happy.

#13 Reedbeta

    DevMaster Staff

  • Administrators
  • 5340 posts
  • LocationSanta Clara, CA

Posted 31 December 2009 - 07:49 PM

Why do you have a spammy-looking signature in the first place if you "know" it will be deleted? Are you a troll? :)
reedbeta.com - developer blog, OpenGL demos, and other projects

#14 ItsJustSomeRandomGuy

    New Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts

Posted 24 April 2010 - 02:54 AM

If this is supposed to save data, then I think it wont work. "Spammers" would just post pointless posts until they could post links.

#15 UnrealSolo

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 29 May 2010 - 01:36 PM

ItsJustSomeRandomGuy said:

If this is supposed to save data, then I think it wont work. "Spammers" would just post pointless posts until they could post links.

thats a good point, however if its a problem here, (not that ive noticed it is) then spammers tend to post quite a few links - which could be flagged as spam, or links in new members posts could be simply subject to aproval, there are also blacklists which could be checked against - most spammers post the same spam to many boards, some use blackilists.

#16 necroside

    Valued Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 143 posts

Posted 30 May 2010 - 07:53 PM

No links?
No Viagra?
No more nude girls?
No more Rouncer songs at myspace?

Why should I come back here? :lol:
"There are not enough servers to run my infinite users game"





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users