What happens when you ask Bush a question
#1
Posted 05 September 2004 - 02:20 AM
#2
Posted 05 September 2004 - 02:37 AM
#3
Posted 05 September 2004 - 02:44 AM
it nearly makes me cry to see a man that dumb make it that far
http://brandonbloom.name
#4
Posted 05 September 2004 - 02:45 AM
"some people talk about federal welfare as if it was some kind of federal program."
#5
Posted 05 September 2004 - 03:03 AM
Now, I am not a Bush fan, but I dislike it when people bash anyone unjustly.
Personally I am voting for the Green party.
#6
Posted 05 September 2004 - 06:04 AM
#7
Posted 05 September 2004 - 06:09 AM
#9
Posted 05 September 2004 - 11:12 AM
Don't you see that each american president from the near past has started a war conflict in the middle east one year before the votes?
#10
Posted 05 September 2004 - 12:57 PM
I don’t know Bush personally, but I do know he lacks communication skills. The speeches he regurgitates generally come out ok, but I notice when he wants to add on the spot “you know… it’s like… you know what I mean, when….” then he tends to dig his own grave. Nothing a little practice in front of the mirror wouldn’t fix.
North of the border, I don’t think anyone can beat our Chrétien’s record. He was truly nutty.
#11
Posted 05 September 2004 - 12:58 PM
as to the video... i think the question included a few more things like kids not learning about tribal governments in school though they are part of their own country and how to resolve issues between tribes and the federal government. but even if it was a stupid question he could have elaborated on that rather than mumbling something that makes no sense at all.
anyway, it's not true that bush only stumbles on his words. this is only one random example picked out of so many that people wrote books about it. personally i have no doubt that he is either dyslexic or boozed his brain to jelly.
mihail : though i agree with you partly (amrica did start many wars in the last decades [so did the soviet union] and somehow many of the people here are in fact are more than a little overweight) i think you should try to provide a few arguements that can be discussed rather than just saying : "can't you see... they are stupid"
#12
Posted 05 September 2004 - 01:06 PM
Quote
yes, because somebody else wrote them. i know very well that every speach is written beforehand but you can demand from a president that he can freely talk about matters of politics in public
Quote
if that was true for him i think somebody in the white house would have thought of giving him lessons in free speech in the past 4 years, don't you ?
#13
Posted 05 September 2004 - 02:07 PM
Quote
#14
Posted 05 September 2004 - 02:16 PM
anubis said:
How about an interview with people from Chicago i saw on the tv the last night:
-Do you know where this year's olimpic games took place?
-Ehm...uhh...erm.. Germany?
-Which city?
-ehm... Madrid?
Of course this can hardly be discussed but it's a good example of what's going on there...
The politic are another argument that can be discussed.. perhaps you've noticed that the politic of Bush is not based on anything else than two words: Peace, Terrorists. Each one of his speachs contains this words in big number of repeation.
It's like: "We'll kill the terrorists so you can continue to live in Peace so vote for me on the next ellections, ok?"
And now something quite funny (or not, depending on how you look at it). As i was checking the news today i saw those demonstrants that support Bush on that huge demonstration. With all those flags, labels, ballons, etc. it looked exactly like: "Sieg hail! Sieg hail!". So, something changed for 65 years? I don't think so...
#15
Posted 05 September 2004 - 02:18 PM
mihail :
Quote
as you are a vivid follower of german television you should know all the interviews with people on the streets of germany. the same could be done in any other country i guess...
the thing about bushes speaches is true though. i guess that is because they haven't got much positive things that happend during the last four years to brag about (none?)
#16
Posted 05 September 2004 - 02:24 PM
#17
Posted 05 September 2004 - 04:39 PM
but somehow, i have the feeling, bush didn't know much more than i.. even while he understood the question.... :D
-Loving a Person is having the wish to see this Person happy, no matter what that means to yourself.
-No matter what it means to myself....
#18
Posted 05 September 2004 - 04:44 PM
"thank you for the question..."
"i was just getting to that..."
"well it greatly depends on...."
"you see, from our view the things are not at all that simple..."
and stuff like that :)
#19
Posted 05 September 2004 - 04:47 PM
hm.. my response would've been.. "thanks for asking.. yeah, i remember the governor time... those where the days" and just drift off in memories :D
-Loving a Person is having the wish to see this Person happy, no matter what that means to yourself.
-No matter what it means to myself....
#20
Posted 05 September 2004 - 04:59 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













